The Disproof (and Proof) Of Everything

Men who are thinking about our existence and purpose, and the nature of the world we live in, men (I am talking about humans because women are included, not gender discrimination). . For most people, the whole process of their life could not find an answer or even found an answer. In most of my life, I was thinking about it myself. Until recently I made a strange conclusion with strange (but logical) logic. Is possible.

Science claims to prove the role of religion in creation and evolution, according to definition, the evidence is "sufficient to prove that things are real, or have faith in truth It is said. When you look at things from various angles, the proof is not evidence but evidence that we choose to believe and choose not to believe. Evidence is to persuade people to believe something. Stewart Chase confused and said, "There is no need to prove to believers, there is no evidence for those who do not believe. (I promise to stop these references: D). Science has caused Big Bang theory and the rise of mankind (lol ... I mean evolution), and religion says creation of humans and the universe is the result of the highest "god". I am very religious, so here I would like to keep neutral. Okay, I am very good. Let's take a look at two views from my own point of view.

Scientists follow scientific methods, their theory must be ascertained by physical experiments. The most outstanding concept about God presents an existence that can not be tested explicitly or effectively, by proof or anti - evidence. On these foundations, questions about the existence of God, ie the problem of not being able to test the evidence, may not be included in the scope of modern science. The Catholic Church believes that understanding the existence of God is "the natural light of human reason." Believers claim that believing in the existence of God may not be suitable for demonstration or refutation, and rely solely on faith.