The Disdainful Use of Names in Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49

Using name contempt in Pynchon's Chrying of Lot 49 When I read Pynchon's "Cry No. 49" I noticed that I was fascinated by the names of these characters. I tried to analyze them and make them meaningful, but Pynchon does not seem to mean that these names have a specific meaning. This inference reminds me of irony of roll naming. This reminds me of the chaotic nature of naming. People who seem to dislike characters using their names seem to mean that the artists laugh at the readers and society through their roles.

Thomas Pinchin's "No. 49 Scream" is a very deep, complex and demanding novel and requires extensive knowledge. One of the most attractive aspects of this novel is picking pinch, or rather inventive. It is the name of the character and organization that he describes in the novel. These names serve as a metaphor for people and the things they represent, so we can understand the hidden meaning of the novel. The main character of No. 49 "Cry" is a woman named Oedipa Maas. Obviously, the name of Oedipa comes from Sophocles' famous hero Oedipus. According to legend, the parents of Edps had found him destined to kill his father and marry his mother. Therefore, they arranged for the child to die. But he was rescued and became an adult of another kingdom. As an adult, Oedipus met a stranger and did not know that he was actually his father.

Gao Ma's second novel "The 49th Lot's Scream" is like the very first book published three years ago, "V." which has received a very high reputation. Pynchon's skilled craftsmanship, Melville, his adaptation of Conrad and Joyce, Faulkner, Nathaniel West and Nabokov's last satire pattern, he and John Barth Joseph Heller, co-creation of the people of the era, his philosophy and psychological Equivalent to the safety of the concept, intimate relationship with the personality - In the first novel these wonderful talents continue to be revealed in the second novel. He used very similar usage