You are currently browsing this article as a guest. If you are a subscriber, please login. If not, please subscribe below and access the entire Harper archive. It is $ 45.99 per year.
Last night, I read Albert Jainock 's "Fault of receiving education". If you have not read it yet, please do before reading the answer below. Without context, the next mess will be arrogant and self-absorbed. I know that this is a hard internet, but I am very good at it. You can read this article. Or pick it up at Amazon. Any non statistician will like his job. The drawbacks of receiving education are groundbreaking for me. Since I read Rompol's revolution, I have not had such a calmness, but at the same time I have a strong sense of belonging. These words did not tell me, they talked for me. They are what I am talking about. Knock secretly said a voice to the wearing attitude.
As Nok said, I have never thought that there might be some inconvenience in receiving education. I have always seen it from an educator's point of view, and education offers many benefits, not from the perspective of today's typical college students aspiring to enter the workplace. At one point, many of our universities are experiencing cultural changes. Bloom calls it "the idea of closing Americans". Since the 1960s, research on humanities has declined and this research has become a variety of refugee camps, where intellectuals who have been exiled from work or retirement tend to be idle. Learning made great progress, oblivion was abandoned, pedicure was established at the expense of culture everywhere in the civilized world. What's wrong?