It is an honor that the Winter Olympic Games will be held. Like a large and popular sports event, it costs a lot of money. With the influence of money and natural greed, the competition for holding competition will intensify and the possibilities of digression will increase. This is the situation of the 2002 Olympic Winter Games in Salt Lake City, Utah. It is well known that the Salt Lake Organizing Committee paid favorable considerations in the form of cash and property to the Olympic parties after winning a bid to host the Olympic Games.
In the late 1990s, a serious problem occurred at the 2002 Olympic Winter Games. Federal bribery investigations, millions of dollars of debt, and certainly the loss of the people's trust, the organizers of the Winter Olympics relaxed their leadership and looked for those who could make miracles. However, not only is the Olympics themselves online, but the reputation of America as a host country is often very serious, it is dangerous to manage and enforce. After a massive review procedure to find those who can undertake this unbearable work while maintaining maximum personal integrity, they came up with a name: Mitromny. Turnaround is his explanation of the crisis and its remedy
After Salt Lake City's bid to the Winter Olympics in 2002 failed (Québec City's compensation claim ($ 8 million) failed), in 1999 many of the rules of the bidding process changed the International Olympic Committee (IOC) We set up an evaluation committee. The committee was appointed on 24th October 2002. Prior to the 2008 Summer Olympic Games, host cities took frequent visits to IOC members. I will receive a gift. Directors and lack of transparency often invite voting fund assertions. Subsequently, the changes brought by the IOC bidding rules were enhanced, and more attention was paid to the technical aspects of the candidate cities. The team analyzed the characteristics of candidate cities and fed them back to the International Olympic Committee.