The Development to The United States Constitution

Why Americans chose the constitutional order they made in 1787 - 1789, and why would they reject democratic and federalism forms that do not exceed ten years? In 1787, 29 representatives gathered in Philadelphia to adjust federal conditions. However, some delegates began to formulate a new Constitution. James Madison proposed a Virginia plan. And it advocates a balanced 3 branch government approach with parliamentary two or two houses.

Constitution and social development are revolution in many respects. 1860 - 1877 is the era of American reconstruction and continuous development. The Constitution and the development of society are developing mainly on the discussion about the rights of African Americans and citizens. These problems are the main cause of the civil war and remain the current debate after the defeat of the south of the north. During this period the ambiguity of the Constitution was treated differently. Power struggle against national rights and African-Americans' rights constitutes a revolution. During these years of change, African-Americans gained freedom and has voting rights amending the constitution accordingly.

According to the 10th amendment of the US Constitution, the basis of the state's rights is the US Constitution. In the tenth revision, it is stipulated that "the authority not approved by the United States by the constitution and the authority not prohibited by the United States is reserved by the country or the citizen," respectively. Some Americans believe that the Constitution has a strict structure, which means that the Federal Government is allowed to adhere to the law in a specific language of the Constitution. Proper "implementation of the authority described in Article 1 of the US Constitution"

Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the US Constitution and many state constitutions and the first revision of state and federal law. Freedom of speech is not absolute, the US Supreme Court acknowledges several statements that are excluded from freedom and the government can take reasonable hours, places or restrictions on speech I admitted. In most cases it is acceptable to criticize the government and to argue that people may find unpleasant opinions contrary to offensive or public policy. There are exceptions to these general protections, such as the testing of obscene articles by Miller, child pornography, temptation to imminent action, regulation of commercial speech such as advertisements.