The Development of Bad and Good Leadership

So far, through reading the leadership, I concluded that you must be a good leader to be a leader. In my opinion, there is no such thing as a bad leader. If you are "bad", you can not become a leader at the beginning. However, Kellerman proposes the fact that it is only two objectives and followers that are needed to be considered a leader. She also revealed the fact that you can become a bad leader and a successful leader at the same time. (Kellerman, 2004). I have seen examples of Hitler, Stalin, Catholic criminals, and many bad leaders in history like Enron's Kenneth.

While we were addressing the leadership problem, I attended the Coca-Cola Company's senior executive meeting on corporate social responsibility. The spokesperson said he had seen excellent leadership and poor leadership in his career. He also said something that made me think about the legacy of the work that we chose to do in society. Who accepts the work we spent a lot of time and energy? These are some of the things I think when I ask friends what leadership is.

I will attend the International Leadership Association's conference and listen to experts discussing the actions of excellent leaders (and believers) and poor leadership. The leader ethicalist Craig Johnson's speech gave me a particularly deep impression. In our leadership-centered society, we bring too much trust to the leaders (perhaps explaining why salaries for high-paying CEOs / are paid). "That makes sense" Not only their responsibility for the bad guys (usually spoiled leaders are imprisoned but often sponsors are not sued) "transfer")

There are good and evil leaders as well as good and evil managers, even in any other life, humanitarian as well. Our response to leaders varies, but most donor workers recognize excellent leadership as soon as they meet a leader. In my opinion, leadership is to achieve something that can not be achieved by affecting others. It is not leadership to simply tell people what to do with people's position, this is management. As rescuers and military, most of the leaders I met were institutional or dominant. It is a convincing leader. I hope that my perfect humanitarian leader will be convincing among these three leaders. But what will happen actually? For centuries military leaders have given us some clues: