The Devastating Consequences of Zero Tolerance and School Discipline Policies

Creating Critical Reflection Journals has a great experience. This is to visit the George Washington Community School, a city school located in Indianapolis, Indiana, and observe the role of teacher preparation. During this visit my goal was to observe the formal, general and frozen registry concepts for communication between teachers, students, employees and the community. During this exposure, I was able to brighten discipline in a new way in the school environment. I would like to introduce this experience and the interaction of communication registers to students' discipline at school.

In 2014, a survey on data in academic disciplines was conducted. We found that pauses and expulsion caused by zero tolerance policy do not reduce school confusion. The authors of the study noted that "zero tolerance on school discipline is not the best way to build a safe learning environment." Zero tolerance policy may be viewed as a quick solution to student problems. This seems like a simple behavior-reactive situation, but ignores mitigation situations, which is often an important detail in student events. Even civil judges will consider relaxing the situation before making a decision. If a zero tolerance policy is adopted in an adult court, it is fundamentally unfair and unconstitutional due to the negligence of the law including appropriate procedure and cruel and abnormal punishment.

Zero tolerance policy is a school disciplinary policy that sets certain results or penalties for specific crimes. According to the definition of zero tolerance policy, the policy that "irrational rules and policies are the same for all people, but unfairly influence people sharing specific attributes" is always discriminatory. The zero tolerance approach was originally introduced in the 1980s. Reducing drug use at school In the 1990s, zero tolerance policy was more widely used. To reduce gun violence, the "Farmless School Law" (GFSA) in 1994 aims to expel schools protected by federal government funds to students bringing guns to schools and school districts during the calendar year Because students seeking to "make" are participating in local law enforcement agencies, the distinction between law breaking violations against schools has become unclear.