The Destruction of Rome: Why Did Rome Fall?

Like its birth, the destruction of Rome did not take place soon. On the contrary, there are many factors that ultimately disappear. The destruction of Rome gradually started from diseases that collapsed from the inside. Political corruption, division between wealthy people and the poor, declining moral value, and public health are all major causes of the disease. For the purpose of this article, disease will be called 'Roman condition'. In order to understand the situation in Rome, we must first understand how it changed from prosperous empire to empty shell after 200 years.

The decline of the empire certainly faded. The collapse of the Roman Empire was due to its low loyalty to Rome. The city center began to collapse. Roman military, political and social conditions also brought about the collapse of Rome. Another reason why Rome and Rome collapsed is that the waterways were destroyed and the public works were done. When something goes down, the whole will collapse. As the people of Rome had to get in and out of the water, the aqueduct caused a collapse of Rome, and when the population collapsed the population gradually decreased from one million to several hundred people. to place. The analogy of the collapse of Rome is that there is a magnificent sand castle, strong, powerful and wealthy. However, the tide rises and flushes

Of course, Rome has a place in fallen emperors and politicians, and morality is part of the reason for the collapse of Rome, of course. But the two most notorious moral obscene emperors in Rome - Caligula and Nero - were worse than the middle of the 1st century BC than Roy Moore and Bill Clinton, but Rome did not reach until 476 AD. I will collapse. In other words, Rome insisted over 400 years after Caligula and Nero's reign (almost twice the American history). Morally grotesque leaders are not a sign of civilization collapse

Like wheat, when two things happen in the same way, they tend to fall the same way. In my opinion, the decline of the United States resembles the decline of Rome, as the decline of the United States resembles the decline of Rome economically, socially and politically. Of course, this is not a coincidence. The founder's father, their worshiper, and the students are hoping that America will become a new Rome illuminating the Potomac River. But I think they might not have thought about the problem they are trying to solve: if Rome is a model worth emulating - and the new Rome ends in the same way as the old Rome Is not it fate?