The Definition of Power

The definition of electricity is a lot. It can control people's speech and behavior. It can get what you want. Power is an indispensable part of any society, otherwise all confusion will collapse; leaders must be established. However, taking extreme measures, power will be bad and confusion will be intense. As Sir Acton said, "Power has a tendency to decay and absolute power is absolutely corrupt." A good example is Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany.

This is not necessarily the definition of power, you can provide yourself, one-to-one relationship, good service to someone at the community level. As Rebecca Solnit pointed out at Harpers in the spring of 2017, this seems to be a kind of nihilistic anger, the definition of this permanent depreciation and anger force - in a study by Jennifer 2001 Lerner and Dacher Keltner, anger Discovered that people feel happy and become optimistic about the result of emotions

Of course the power logo is characterized by deep differences in the basic definition of power (for a detailed discussion of various definitions Luhmann, 1969; Habermas, 2006; Lukes, 1986, or Zaaiman, 2007 ). I did not provide a new definition, we mentioned four rather classic definitions, as they cover the widely accepted and most basic aspects. My starting point is three classical monographs on power. These famous monographs were written in the context of the two world wars, perhaps because of the power of the human being during warfare and intense experience of powerlessness. First of all, considering his economic and social volume, published in German sociologist Max Weber (1864-1920) in 1921 and later widely regarded as the most important single research in sociology Please (Camic et al., 2005). Back page) Weber's definition of power is often quoted:

Robert Dahl (1961) continued Weber's approach regardless of whether it is the definition of power or its attributes to specific human factors. Weber discussed the power in the context of the organization and its structure, but Dahl positions the discussion of power within the realm of the community. However, the importance of Dahl is in the development of interest in understanding the rules that emerged after the Second World War (Mills, 1956; Hunter, 1953). According to his community strength theory, while power is exercised by a particular particular individual in the community, other individuals are prevented from doing what they want, just like the actual ones. Exercising power is to enable those who can follow the personal preferences of those with power. Power means to follow other people's preferences, including expanding the rights of others and including them.