Since its existence, terror itself and its application has caused a lot of controversy. The definition of terrorism has not been clearly established since this expression was first used in the 18th century. In addition, its importance has changed for decades between new ideologies, inventions of technology such as explosive inventions, the emergence of nuclear weapons, and new terrorism techniques - extortion and bloody suicide attacks.
In this regard, the definition of terror differs in the definition of the term "terrorism" under the terrorism hosted by the state and the definition of the meaning of terrorism under the International Court of Justice. For example, in the case of Nicaragua, Nicaragua filed suit against the United States on its secret support for armed insurgents active in Nicaragua, with secret support from the Santino Government Farabundo Marti National. El Salvador Liberation Front. The problem is that international law that violates the US legal response to Nicaragua, which is supposed to be funded, supported, equipment, training, and strategically directed by Nicaraguan rebels who are trying to overthrow the government of Sandino There is an interstate rule in the rule. 12)
Terrorism is systematic use of terrorism, in particular as a means of compulsion. However, in the international community, there is no widely accepted, legally binding criminal law definition. The general definition of terrorism is based on religious, political or ideological goals, intentionally targeting or ignoring the safety of noncombatants (civilians), fear ( Terrorist) that is aimed at the creation of violent acts only.
Webster's dictionary defines terrorism as a systematic use of terrorism and fear, especially as a mandatory measure. Another definition of terrorism is a plan to use violence against civilians (or the threat of violence) to achieve political, religious, or ideological goals, which stimulates intimidation or compulsion or fear It is achieved by doing. However, the definition of terror has been proved controversial. The international community has failed to develop the definition of universally agreed, legally binding terrorism. In a briefing to the Australian Parliament, Angus Martin said, "The international community has never succeeded in developing a comprehensive definition of terrorism. In the 1970s and 1980s, the United Nations mainly defined the definition of this term Discrepancy in opinion I tried to decide: The members talked about the use of violence in the liberation of the state and the collision of self-determination. "