The Debate Over Net Neutrality Laws

In 2005, Vonage, a telephone company that called out over the Internet or the Internet, appealed the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on an unknown service provider interfering with telephone service. The Federal Communications Commission investigated the complaint and confirmed that the telephone company Madison River is responsible for stopping the blocking of data sent from Vonage (Higginbotham, 2010). This case is one of the first cases in which Internet service providers discriminated on data transmission over the Internet because Vonage and Madison River are competing phone service companies.

Discussion on net neutrality has continued since the 1980's, but recently the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) attracted attention in December 2017 which decided to release the rule on net neutrality . This substantial abolition has made it possible for Internet service providers (ISPs) and telecommunications companies to choose to slow down the Internet or increase billing amounts for access to specific websites That means that. The neutrality of the network is the basic principle that all data is equal. That is, the ISP should treat all Internet traffic equally. People should be able to access everything on the Internet without any obstacle. In other words, anyone can create their own websites and web services and provide them to those who can access the Internet.

Ajit Pai, who challenged Title II in 2015 against the title II earlier this year, resumed this discussion. The neutrality of the network means treating Internet traffic fairly and equitably. Although PI agrees with the basic principles of network neutrality, asserting them does not mean that the FCC needs to regulate broadband according to the rules designed for telephone monopoly in 1934. By simplifying the introduction of broadband, large and small Internet service providers will provide faster and more reliable broadband services, as network neutrality can be better protected.