The Debate Concerning the Morning-After Pill

0 INTRODUCTION In this article we will look for a recent discussion on the limit of the availability of Plan B's one-step drugs to prevent pregnancy after intercourse. Five main problems have been identified to analyze this discussion and are shown from 0 to 0, respectively. Section 0 has a brief conclusion and reference is at the end of this document. As a background to these analyzes, it may be useful to know the chronological order of events, as described in the New York Times article "Judges reach extreme age limit after morning".

Contrary to the wishes of supporters of abortion, RU - 486 does not end the discussion of abortion. This hazardous chemical is not a "morning" medicine, it can be used to "prevent" pregnancy rather than "simple" medicine, but it needs to help with the treatment of medicine It is very complicated and complex It is processing. Surgical abortion. The pills themselves are only inspected for a very short time due to the nature of the drug test, but they show many problematic side effects. In addition, many pharmaceutical companies are reluctant to transport the first 'human insecticide'. Efforts to bring this notorious substance into our country are reminiscent of promoting the legitimization of other 'magical medicine' from Europe, thalidomide.

In this election year, political discussion on the division problem of receiving medicine and abortion in the morning and evening shows that there is a high possibility that it comes from outdated or erroneous scientific speculation about how the pill works It was. They interfere with the production of fertilized eggs, so they do not meet the definition of abortion drugs by abortion opponents. Among the supporters including this, suspicion that the Obama administration is directly threatening to carry out the reform of the national medical system in the controversy over this problem Long-term outlook This problem is "election year" Please acknowledge that it is a "split" problem of the "New York Times" caveat, and note the part quoted by the New York Times. Later on, the article acknowledged that the controversy over emergency contraceptives is being considered ... the debate over the Obama administration's medical law.

On a website called "the truth about Chiang Mai", I discussed the details of how the pill actually works. "Emergency contraceptives / contraceptives have three modes of action (as with conventional contraceptives), that is, they can function in one of three ways: 1) normal menstrual cycle Changes in ovulation delayed ovulation means that eggs are not released 3) It stimulates the endometrium (endometrium) and therefore inhibits implantation.