The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

"Everyone has the right to life, freedom, and personal safety." This is the third article on the overall slowdown of human rights. It sounds easy. Everyone has the right to life. In other words, no one has the right to take it. Everyone should not be allowed to kill another person. It should be easy. However, still a murder occurs in our society, and the method to solve it is a big argument. What kind of penalty should be imposed on those who take away others' lives.

The death penalty is a kind of brutal punishment and the United States should abolish it because it should not admit such punishment. It should be abolished, not just because it is savage. It also violates the US Constitution, which most Americans think is sacred. Furthermore, even if it is still legal in the United States, the death penalty will not achieve that goal. Because the above reasons should be abolished, the death penalty has not reached its main purpose

The use of the death penalty is more rational than the abolition of the death penalty. The death penalty should not be abolished in order (1) to prevent people from committing murder, (2) the death penalty reassures the victims and their families and ends the crime. The argument of the article (1) should not abolish the death penalty as the potential victims will live by fear of the highest form of punishment. (2) The capital punishment should not be abolished. Because ... the death penalty in the United States treats people unreasonably and unfairly due to their amount, attorney's skills, ethnic victims, crime. Ground it. Especially when the victim is wasting money of the taxpayer and it is a white male who does not have the public security interest to put a certain pressure, the people of color are likely to be executed from white people. It is not necessary to be "soft crime" to "to study sustainable impact"