The Death of Humanity: A Response to Michael Levin’s Article,

In his article "torture case", Michael Levine's claim is that in today's modern world torture is often thought to extract information in a savage and primitive way, but actually prevents terrorist attacks It is a viable way to do it. It should be used as such. Levin acknowledges that the use of torture as a means of interrogation may be unconstitutional, but that the lives of millions of people should exceed the constitutional ethics of this issue. He did not acknowledge the use of torture as punishment, but he continued to point out that he considered it a reasonable solution to bring out a terrorist plan.

I am trying to analyze Michael Levine's articles on "torture cases". This article mainly states that it is necessary to use torture to protect the lives of many innocent people. In his case he claims that terrorists massacred millions of innocent people and proved the use of torture to prevent this extreme barbaric behavior. In fact, this is a moral matter on causing painful behavior. Please look at the state of war. Since we know that this is the only way to protect our national sovereignty and our lives, we will never say that it is immoral to kill warriors and give pain to enemies in war Hmm.

Article on Michael Levine's "Torture case". It is reasonable to focus on the use of torture as a necessary and important article to protect many innocent people and social lives. In one of his examples, he massacred millions of innocent people on a large scale, proving the use of torture to verbally prevent such barbaric and savage acts I said. This is a moral issue about sabotage. - In his article "torture case", Michael Levine's assertion is that in modern world today torture is often considered barbarous and primitive information extraction method, but in fact it is a way to prevent terrorist attacks It is an executable method. The means should be used like this. Levin admits that the use of torture as a means of interrogation may be unconstitutional, but that the lives of millions of people should exceed the constitutional morality of the problem.

Michael Levin believes that the use of torture as a means to save lives is reasonable and necessary in the article published in the 1982 issue of "The Torture Case" by Newsweek. Starting with a very general premise, Levin presented a series of exaggerated litigation. There, torture may be justified in order to provide a precedent for torture in a more "realistic litigation". However, the author never fully defines the boundaries and conditions behind his premise. It is thought that it is necessary to ignore civil liberties and it shows that there may be reasons to keep the freedom of the same citizen. Throughout the article, Levin obviously used several arguments with logical flaws and did not solve the problem that could ultimately be raised against his argument, but instead he We have introduced the discussion and conclusion into the fire and sulfur speech by fear. .