Given the experience of radiologists and other experts in cohort mortality over 50 years, it is postulated that these populations differ from the expected reduction in radiation exposure. In comparison with other experts who entered the cohort of the North American Radiation Society before 1940, the radiologist's total death cause mortality rate is too high, even if the number of deaths from cancer is excluded from that rate, The remaining. These data are consistent with the concept of accelerated aging caused by radiation. By 1949, radiologists showed cancer death rates 10 years higher than other experts. In the cohort of 1950-1959 it was not enough age to prove the expected peak cancer mortality rate at the age group of 60-64 years. Several hypotheses have been proposed to present reasons for the differences in trends in age-specific cancer mortality through the registration cohort
We compared the radiologist 's experience at cohort mortality over 50 years with other experts with low levels of radiation exposure. Several chronic diseases have the highest mortality rate among radiologists in 1920 - 1929 participating in the North American Radiation Society. After this initial stage, the radiologist evaluated that the death rate due to cancer was the highest. The excess risk of leukemia observed in the group between 1920 - 1929 and 1930 - 1939 subsequently decreased. At the same time, the mortality rate of lymphoma, especially multiple myeloma, markedly increased the number of deaths experienced by radiologists admitted to the professional association between 1940 and 1949 between 1930 and 1939 . Possible relationships between this finding and radiation induced immunological changes have been proposed.
Mortality rate of current radiologists and other physicians: Specific cause of death
Early studies comparing cancer mortality rates between British radiologists registered at the radiation laboratory before 1920 with radiation technologists who began practicing at the time of initial protection proposal showed significant evidence of exposure and risk . Radiologists registered since 1920 have cancer mortality comparable to the mortality rate of all healthcare workers, but radiologists are still likely to have high cancer risks due to long-term radiation exposure Respectively. Experimental studies on cellular inactivation, mutation, and radiation effects such as cancer have utilized experimental workers to accurately regulate target cell or tissue radiation doses. Similarly, epidemiological studies of exposed populations benefit from the ability of scientists to rebuild individual, even organ specific radiation doses.
Breast cancer is the most common cause of lung cancer death in the world. Early detection and effective treatment of breast cancer can expand treatment options and lower mortality rate. Various approaches such as mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most effective means for the early detection of breast cancer. As explained by radiologists, problems such as image quality and technical reasons related to human error have increased the misdiagnosis rate of breast cancer. In order to overcome these limitations, a CAD system was developed to automate the detection of breast cancer and to classify benign and malignant lesions. The CAD system improves the radiologist's ability in finding and identifying between normal and abnormal tissues. These procedures are only performed as dual readers, but absolute decisions are still made by radiologists