The Current Educational System Suppresses Creativity

In this world, the general concept of success and the ambitions of many people are limited to material wealth and value. Eligibility is the same as success. The higher the qualification, the higher the success rate. Otherwise, you should say your annual income. However, in today's workplace environment there are many qualified persons in important education fields such as mathematics and English. In terms of employability, the only factor that distinguishes people and promoting business is the innovative idea that comes from accepting individual creativity.

Land concludes that children are born with a creative life and their creativity is being hindered when learning behavior that is not creative. Since our educational system and social rules and regulations fundamentally utilize all of our creativity, we have nothing left when we grow up. Ken Robinson also reached the same conclusion in the 2006 influential TED address. Professor of management and Jeff Dyer (strategic professor at Brigham Young University) have clear answers to my search. Pointing genetics

In other words, the current education system is ready to educate next generation creative leaders. First, the school does not use creativity for testing. Although there have been sufficient examples for many years to show that creative and intellectual people are not high scores in the exams provided by the school. Second, the school chooses the most important subject. This is by no means art. The time of the final course is severe and it is not suitable for student learning process.