The Cultural Conflict of Hugh Selwyn Mauberley

Cultural Conflict of Hugh Selwin Mobley By modeling how to write an ancient poet, Ezra Pound shows his attitude towards modern civilization, his famous poem "Hugh Selwyn Mobly". "It is a stereotype - in this poem, pound revealed his disagreement with the industry - although this poem is an imitation of other ancient poetry style and epic style, it is ironic In order to fully understand the difference between pound and contemporary culture, you must explain your position first.

His poem "Hugh Selwyn Moralee" is composed of 18 short films describing a poet whose life has become boring and meaningless. It was published in June 1920 and announced parting to London. He was tired of the massive loss of life during the war and could not be reconciled. Just as Stephen J. Adams denied that Eliot was Prufrock, Pound wrote that he denied that he was Mobley, but this work can still be interpreted as autobiography . The first was satire analysis of London's literary world, then directed towards social criticism, economics and attacks on the causes of warfare; Galileo's words first appeared in his work. Critic F. R. Rebis regards this poem as the main achievement of the pound.

Hugh Selwyn Mauberley (1920) avoids the problem of being evaluated as a translation because the title points to an imaginary poet, not a historical poet. However, this poem was also misunderstood by the reader of the author's intention. In a letter to Professor Felix Schelling of July 1922, pound explained Prothus and Mobley as "portrait" which is an expression of his sensibility. Protipius represents the characteristics of his age by Roman writers; Mobley, the role of contemporary British critic poet. Both verses, the pound said to Xie Lin, he tried to enrich James' novels, both of which are dramatic lyrics. Michael Alexander says in "Ezra Pound's poetic achievement", "Mobly is a deep, suggestive, difficult poem, very intensive and complicated".