The Cuban Missile Crisis: Eyeball to Eyeball

Missile crisis in Cuba: Between eyeballs between each other: America, Cuba and the Soviet Union America and the Soviet Union again used their own wars with other countries. Theo Batista dictatorship. Due to the mixture of nationalism and leftist ideology, the United States became extremely cautious about the southern part, and perhaps her own comrade in Latin America. When Castro acquired Cuba, America lost valuable investment in Cuban sugar and tobacco crops.

In the height of the Cuban-Missile crisis in October 1962, US Secretary of State Rahn said: It is expected that the most dangerous nuclear conflict among the superpowers will be resolved, and many analysts interpret it as a typical example of a nuclear "chicken". The goal of the United States is to immediately dismantle the Soviet missiles and US policy makers seriously consider the two strategies to achieve this goal. These may be a maritime blockade, or "separation", first of all to prevent missile transport and then take more powerful action to induce the withdrawal of missiles set up in the Soviet Union. The second option is "surgical air raid" to destroy installed missiles as much as possible, then invade the island.

One of his historians is Dino Brugioni. He wrote a book on Cuba 's missile crisis and the decisions it made, written in 1990. Bruggioni considers the best option to be an air raid option rather than a blockade. He said that although this is a very radical choice, it shows the true power of Americans to the world and will completely stop the cold war. This seems like a very arrogant attitude, but this situation seems reasonable, so it has some reliability. Bourgeoni is one of a few people who think that blockade is not the best option. Another major historian of the crisis is Keith Eubank, another analysis of the crisis who wrote "missile crisis" in Cuba.