The Crimean Crisis Is a Soft Power Versus Hard Power Conflict

The Crimean crisis was the name of an ongoing international conflict, mainly concentrated on the Crimea peninsula. The Crimea Peninsula was governed by Ukraine as the Crimea Autonomous Republic. This area is multi-ethnic, mainly Russia. In February 2014, after the Ukraine Revolution, the Russian troops entered this area and was integrated into the Crimean Autonomous Region under the management of the Russian Federation. The United Nations does not recognize this movement and conflict resolution is far from certain, but the crisis is still an excellent opportunity to analyze the use of political power.

The concept of power in international relations can be explained as the degree of resources, capacity and influence in the international situation. It is usually divided into concepts of hard power and soft power, soft power associated with compulsion, such as the use of force, mainly forced use, and soft power usually covering economic, diplomatic and cultural influences. However, there is no clear border between the two forms of authority. Perhaps the most important concept behind power and sovereignty is the national behavior that other countries seek to gain their own interests or benefits. Whether ambitious or operational, the people's interests are divided by core / important and peripheral / non-essential interests. Core or important interests constitute a country that is trying to defend or expand through territory, ideology (religion, politics, economy) or its civil conflict.

The ability of the United States to raise national interest will have to depend on hard power and soft power. Hard power is based on familiar military power and economic power. The ability to choose from each other rather than soft power depends on intangible resources such as culture, ideology, use of international organizations to determine the framework of discussion. In the Gulf Crisis it is important to bring the military strong forces quickly to Saudi Arabia but it is equally important to have a weak power to formulate a UN resolution and to treat Iraq's entry into Kuwait as a violation of sanctions It is important.

Soft power is different from hard power. How to understand the actual soft power better, and why do you need to do so. But because power is power, the hard power and soft power levels must interact and affect each other, if not all. In order to gain a deeper understanding of what is soft power and how to use it, the problem of relationship between hard power and soft power must be addressed. Hard power is an indication of the national identity identification and traditional ease like military and economic capacity. Next is a method to measure soft power. People are always aware of state power in the context of national leaders' inherent power potential to achieve international goals and integrate them into international influences. So, the country has the possibility of raw soft power, and if so, the best way to cultivate it and use it? Hard power is often restricted and considered to be expendable items. Is this the same with soft power?