The Corruption of Italian Governments in "We Won't Pay! We Won't Pay!"

Since the end of the Second World War, Italy has over 50 governments. This means that there is nearly one government every year. Due to the confusion of their country, Italian politics was always a sensitive topic of the Italian community. The play of Dario Buddha looks at this and reveals government strategies used in funny and ironic ways. The focus of Fo is mainly currency and its value. In Italy for a while the prices of goods and services are very high due to inflation and people could afford the most common things like bread and sugar.

In the figure above, the price curve for eth is P = Q. Suppose you have a Q0 token and you want to purchase Q1-Q0. P0 is too low to pay, so P1 is too expensive so I will not pay. You need some intermediate price. And it is the same as buying one token for each purchase. From the basic calculation, we know that the area under the curve is the sum you will spend, and we calculate using only the integral determined between Q 1 and Q 2. Alternatively, calculate the definite integral between the origin and Q1, subtract the integral between the origin and Q0, and find the region marked A and red. The integration of the price function is

No, we do not; if we leave, the government has indicated that we will stay in free trade areas in Europe. Subscription fee must be paid. It is almost the same amount as the amount paid at present. The inflation rate will rise and may of course rise. It may cost £ 50 million a day. What people want We have exported 2.7 billion pounds to Germany in April and 1.5 billion pounds to France from HMRC's own data. Our imports from these countries are £ 5.2 billion and £ 2.8 billion respectively, and trade with other EU countries is meaningless compared to trade between the two countries. The French and Germans are really at risk of 8 billion pounds we use for their products each month. "No, I'm sorry, you can not have BMW." Of course not

If you can not express the solution you are looking for without relying on vulgarity, you may not offer a solution at all. Dirty words may draw our attention, but for most of us, they will not pay home loans. They do not pay nursery fees. They will not put food on the table. They do not guarantee that our children are educated. They can not guarantee that our leaders with power are paying attention to our interests. Perhaps they will look for some viable solutions when politicians throw seven words and multiple middle fingers to prove that they are awkwardly angry. Everyone can be irrationally angry and you can call people who oppose them. It is a special leader who can provide a reasonable solution and implementation plan.