The Controversy Over Animal Testing

Your daily necessities are used from when you are a baby to adult animals. From Pampers, you wear as a baby, Johnson and Johnson you wash. When you grow up, you are using Febreeze, Sunsilk and Gillette. (Animal laboratory company) Animal experiments will develop mainly around your respective daily activities. "It is estimated that there are around 100 million animals in the world that are used for animal experiments." (Animal Rights) Animal experiments arise from natural curiosity. How the interior of a living thing works and looks like an interesting idea.

Alternatives to animal experiments are under development as a controversy on ethics of animal experiments, and in some countries immediate cosmetic animal experiments are selected. Tests other than 50 animals have been tested for use, more are under development and may replace animal experiments and may be more effective. The cosmetic test is banned in the Netherlands, India, Norway, Israel, New Zealand, Belgium and the UK, and after a 13-year discussion in 2002, the EU agreed to abolish the comprehensive ban on this product . Since 2009, cosmetics for animal experiments are sold throughout the EU, and all experiments on animals for animal experiments are prohibited. Cosmetic animal tests were conducted in EC Regulation 1223/2009. France is the headquarters of L'Oreal, the world's largest cosmetic company, protesting the prohibited proposal by filing a lawsuit in Luxembourg's Luxembourg and requesting the cancellation of the ban.

Cosmetic manufacturers can choose to use non-animal methods to create safety data. However, the use of animals in cosmetic testing is controversial. Animal experiments on cosmetic safety are prohibited in the European Union and in several other countries. Many other countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia, Brazil and even China, are working on at least cosmetic products to end animal experiments. One of the reasons European countries banned animal testing faster than in the United States is that they have enacted laws and directives that the company must comply. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims to be a strong supporter of improvements, reductions and alternative plans for animal experiments, but the authorities continue to accept animal experiments to confirm safety, You can manage whether or not you can use.

Especially concerning commercial products, controversy and controversy over animal experiments. Advocates of animal experiments believe that there is no alternative and that the tradition of animal experiments over the years takes precedence over other methods. In addition, supporters believe that public health and welfare depends on animal experiments and believe that eliminating animal experiments may lead to the sale of unsafe or dangerous products. On the other hand, people who oppose animal experiments insist on animal welfare, and that animals should consider their own health. In addition, animal supporters believe that scientific test results can not be truly accurate and reliable if they are obtained from abused, neglected or abused animals. Along with the passage of time and further development of technology, many tests on animal subjects have been scientifically questioned.