The Controversy of Approving the Dream Act

In the past few years, the controversy over "dream" seems to have ended. About ten years ago, a young Ivan Nikolov and his mother entered from Russia and missed the court date one year after they arrived. Nikolov's mother married a US citizen, but was forcibly repatriated to Russia. Nikolov was charged with prison for three months as being in violation of the immigration law, but he did not commit any sin and did not choose to stay in the US without a legitimate position.

Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission voted to restore freedom of the Internet at a ratio of 3 to 2. This action killed the net neutrality rule that dominated the Internet since 2015. According to the efforts of the citizens expressing a big opinion poll and opposed opinion, this is a controversial act opposed by most Americans. During the comment period, Congress showed that most Americans objected to discontinuation with more than a million phone calls, tens of millions of emails, and extensive public opinion polls. The Federal Communications Commission announced a statement that "the review process is not a vote," and suggested that Russian hackers and operators send e-mails to cancel these comments.

In the past few weeks, dream activists and supporters gathered in Washington to promote a clean 'dream bill', but took a vacation without considering Congress. Congress approved a short-term expenditure bill (same level until January 19, 2018) to avoid closing the government and advance legislative measures to resolve DACA by the end of next year. Democrats said they would not take expenditure bills that do not include dreams; they now say they simply "postpone" their support until Congress returns in January.

Since "President Trump" announced the end of childhood arrival action plan (DACA), "Dream law" and "border barrier" have become a problem of internal relations. In current understanding, only the Democratic Party has approved the Republican-led border guard bill, and the Republican parties allow to pass a specific version of "dream". In consultation, contrary to the future of those who escaped unexplainable violence now and in the future, we made full use of the fate of people who lived in the United States for most of the time. Congressmen must reject this agreement. You should not use the population as a tip for negotiation