The Contrasting Tasks of Historians and Scientists

Because I can count from the current age for several years to find out what year I should go to kindergarten and decide where I can remember to find out where in the country I live. Because our parents are unlikely to deceive me because of a strong bond as a family, we can take emotions into account. As far as understanding history it is important to find out if this is a really new situation. Whether it has nothing to do with what happened in the past.

History and humanities are thought of as two different knowledge fields, but what they share in common is that they all relate to human existence and interaction. "The work of historians is to understand the past and conversely trying to change the future," suggesting ways to distinguish these two fields based on the timeframes associated with each field. Access to knowledge: Although history focuses on past events, analysis of their causes and influences, humanities such as geography and psychology predict the future and change more human activity models to change I am trying to find it. However topics such as geopolitics and evolutionary anthropology can fill in the time gap between history and humanities and overlap intellectual goals in these two areas.

Prior to 1950, the history of science was a field that has been practiced primarily by prominent scientists who have written a comprehensive overview of subjects for hero biographies and educational purposes. In past generations, scientists such as Alexander Koyré, Anneliese Maier, EJ Dijsterhuis and others developed a method of scientific history that is not a theoretical and technical achievement in recording science. An important element in this development is the recognition of institutional and social elements in scientific practice. The result of this historical revolution is the distinction between internal scientific history and external scientific history. The internal history of science includes the development of theories and methods used by scientists. In other words, in the advance of science, we study events, people's history, and ideas.

Anthropologists, scientists, philosophers, historians, and most social scientists have reviewed what science is and how it works. They are challenging the traditional distinction between hard science (physics, chemistry, biology etc.) and soft science (psychology, sociology, anthropology). I think they have more in common than they had thought before. Anthropologists will help studies and rethink what science is, by gathering information about the various cultural perspectives that participants observe during the field survey process.