The Constitution and Our Founding Fathers

Constitution and our founder For most Americans, the Constitution of the United States (including the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence) is regarded as almost sacred documents. These wood pulp decorated with marginal poetry was raised to a level that prevents us from completely changing them, afraid to be condemned as being God. There is no doubt about the true value of these documents, but I wonder why we keep those documents.

Indian constitutionalists and our founder are very determined to provide equality rights to men and women. "Indian Constitution" is one of the most equal documents in the world. It establishes provisions to ensure general equality, and in particular gender equality. The various provisions of the Constitution support women's rights socially, politically and economically by comparing with men. The principles that guide the national policy also contain important provisions on women's empowerment and the government is responsible for enacting laws and applying them when planning policies. These have not been heard in court, but they are very important for governance. Some of them are as follows.

How did this fundamental change occur? Why was the founder of our country replaced our first "constitutional" federal provision with the US Constitution? In defending the constitution at the end of 1787, Alexander Hamilton said: "People seem to be left to the people of this country, or they are doomed to rely on their political constitution for accidents and forces" (Hamilton, Jay and Madison, 1937 , No. 1, p. 3). In Hamilton's words, "How does this country decide" important issues "?

Since the commencement of the voluntary constitutional council, during the preparation of the Constitution, the founders and our motives of our great country have been questioned and analyzed. This also applies to this century. Two historians John P. Roche and Richard Hofstadter have published a paper that wrote what happened in the history of our country. Both papers were written within 20 years, but historians proposed two different views on the events of the Constitutional Council.