Before her book "Silent Spring" was published in 1962, Rachel Carson knew it would be controversial. Carson wrote about ways to use pesticides recklessly to pollute the natural environment and slowly poison the living things. She knew that her statement amazes "99 out of 100 people." Many people, especially those in the chemical industry, will definitely feel threatened by her book. She knew that these people attacked her and tried not to trust her writing, but that did not stop her. Carson believes her book. She wants to inform us about the facts about pesticides in general and she wants this to lead to more stringent environmental law.
Carson did not know how popular and influential her book is. Shortly after the publication of Silent Spring, even John F. Kennedy 's president knew about it.
By recognizing the higher level results of natural optimization it is found that people who exceed the primary outcome of their decisions and who ignore the effects of the results after 2 nd will rarely reach their goal I will. This is because the first order results tend to be opposite to the second order results, resulting in a big mistake in decision making. For example, although the primary outcome of exercise (time spent with pain) is generally considered undesirable, secondary outcomes (healthy and attractive appearance) are desirable. Likewise, delicious food tends to get worse for you.
Most people can not tolerate pain because of the lack of fundamental understanding of how the results work. There are more kinds of results. The first order is the result, then the second, third etc results. Let me give an example. When you go to the gym - the impact of the first order - then the second adaptation - the third, more energy etc How you work with psychology, cognitive bias is your thinking and your It is nearly impossible to understand what you truly want, what you are dealing with, and who you are, unless you have the basis of how it affects the decision-making process. You feel that you have not experienced anything or that other people on the planet have no life or do not draw the situation or emotion of the book
In this book, Taylor explains how the results of our choice are directly related to the decisions we make - people often make the wrong decision and as a result of their decision I think that I can avoid it. They hope someone wants to save them from their bad choice (Does it seem well-known in this era?) But usually no one can help them: people I want to convey the result of action miraculously. We tend to save results with little or no effort. This tendency is facilitated by those who are going to pay debt and repayment obligations through bankruptcy after assuming a large debt or those who take medication to treat symptoms rather than altering symptoms that cause symptoms It is reflected in. Since you can not select the result, you should try to change the behavior. We have to take responsibility