The Conflict of Freedom of Speech and Our Desire For Healthy Campaigns in a Healthy Democracy

Our desire for sound contradiction of freedom of expression and healthy movement in sound democracies Here we have two important values ​​of direct contradiction: sound freedom of speech and a healthy democracy in sound democracy Desire for exercise. You can not have both. The minority leaders of the Richard House of Representatives are based on public opinion The first goal should be to protect it I should set up a government without a newspaper I should decide whether to create a newspaper without a government Is it? I will not hesitate. The latter is selected.

"Sound democracy is entirely dependent on freedom, within reasonable limits, it depends entirely on freedom of thinking and freedom of speech, there is no complete freedom of speech or complete freedom All other things ultimately create a power structure that leads to repression and history tells us that if a group is suppressed for a long time they will stand up, And they revolutionize and the revolution is usually very harmful Many people are injured, and in the revolution, in many cases repressive systems are simply replaced by others I will.

Our democracy is built on freedom of speech, freedom of protest, and freedom to participate in discussions on health. The dialogue is a step forward. It is another thing to spend talking about my dollar. Performance is the third method of American tradition, part of long-term existence. Parades, sit in, boycotts are an important strategy in the feminist era. On the second day of Donald Trump 's inauguration on January 21, I was very pleased to be able to participate in the Million Women's Championship in Washington, DC. One day, our first female presidential election will be a breakthrough event. I want to inspire millions of people, open doors and want to advance cultural change with our way of thinking about women. Cultural change is particularly important. It is normal to ask women to elect president. After the first woman broke the ceiling of the glass she wanted the future female presidential election not to focus on the candidate's gender but rather to concentrate on her policy. There is still something to do before reaching this point

Negative election cycles are not necessarily harmful to our democracy - freedom of speech is sound and fundamental to our country. But the style of attack is important. I think that attacking candidates against the problem may help voters get different opinions about policies and positions. However, perhaps "Distortion", "Hatred", "Sorry" remarks are embarrassed and distracting. Will democracy retreat if it goes too far? I have collected about 250 million additional data points related to candidates and comment thread ... I am waiting for analysis. If you would like to help clarify this social media turmoil, please contact :) patrick dot martinchek gmail dot com