The Conduct of the Generals on the Western Front

In the war of 1914, the actions of the western front generals are unable to know the disasters that any country will encounter over the next four years. For many soldiers, the war started and ended in an entrenchment, where thousands were killed. The number of people killed or injured is huge. All countries including England, France, and Germany were devastated. By the end of World War I, all generations of young people seem to have died. The strategies adopted by the generals have many drawbacks.

"First of all, we should strengthen the central front and relocate at least three armed forces boosted by artillery, one army can be obtained from the West, the other armies can get from the southwest "Of course I understand what the term" abandon Kiev "means for all Soviet people and Stalin. Since the general staff and I personally saw it, I have to suggest the only possible and correct strategic decision in the present situation as the staff's chief.

I found that it is very useful to study the views and explanations on Jukov's war actions. He served as Chief of Staff in 1941, former commander was dismissed as chief of staff and later deputy chief of staff, and after proveing ​​that he has the ability to win the battle, he has little to do with the war understood. He certainly demoted, but he was assigned to the forefront rather than being arrested. He was unable to withdraw from the statement that Kiev could not successfully defend - he proved this to be correct - but if his senior command proposal is not adopted