The concept of power exists in every field of every organization. But power is not always negative. Having a reasonable type of authority is important for criminal justice organizations. The main role of power in criminal justice administration should be to comply with all kinds of subordinates and to turn this power into an acceptable form of power with the passage of time (Stojkovic et al., 2008 ). For this reason, power is an important attribute of criminal justice agencies.
At the same time, the concept of power has been regarded as an explanation of compliance, except for the concept of power. Max Weber made a basic distinction between power and authority. Power includes power and coercion, but this is only an important element of the internal process of the organization. On the other hand, an authority does not mean power, but rather a form of power that includes suspension of its recipient's judgment. We believe that we should obey instructions and orders, so follow instructions and orders, ie compliance is optional. This requires a common value system between members of the organization, which usually meets this requirement. In other words, authority is often called authorization or legal authority.
Summary and Basic Principles Since governments are defined as people and groups with the power to perform specific functions within society it is important to understand the concept of authority and the concept of authority related. In relation to the government, power can be understood as the ability to direct or control someone or something. Therefore, power is a neutral term intended for good or bad purposes. Power is the power that people have the right to use for customs, law, or consent of rulers. In the United States, the authority of the government comes from the consent of the people.
There is no mysticism in the essence or origin of the American national concept or its authority. We set up the government with the consent of the ruler and the Bill of Rights robs the authorities any legitimate opportunity to obtain a compelling consent. The power here is not governed by authority but by public opinion. . . . Clearly, none of these complaints has been promised, so did not respond to God's mention in the promise. However, when Congress moved in this direction in May 1954, the Unitarian Association opposed it as it was "infringement of freedom of religion". The same anti-communist energy was added under "God" commitment In 1956, the state adopted a new motto "We believe in God" and the subsequent challenge to the promised word of God is Often it intertwines with this motto's challenge.