The Concept of Discourse Community by John Swales Q&A

First of all, I would like to say that this article is very difficult for me. For me this is an article and I will have to read some time to begin trying to understand. The framework of this article warns that the description style of Swales is "a bit dry and formal" (WAW 216).

As we discussed it in class, I am familiar with the six characteristics of the discourse community. First, I will explain the discourse community that has a common purpose and concern. The second argument is that the discourse community must have a way to communicate with other members like group conferences. The third argument is that the discourse community is participating in relevant information that will help us achieve that purpose. Just as CrossFitters pays CrossFit journals and actively participates. Fourth, the discourse community will develop and exploit different types to convey goals and events. Newspapers and Web sites updated everyday. The fifth explains the discourse community to include languages ​​strictly used in specific communities. People outside the community may not know like the words that explain their actions and equipment to use. Finally, Section 6 states that the discourse community must have an appropriate proportion of leaders and participants to keep it functioning and functioning to further achieve its common goal.

I am working on CrossFit's project. A common goal (Characteristic 1) is healthy and healthy, there is a healthy and healthy community outside the CrossFit community. They participate in training sessions and participate in local gyms (Feature 2) to participate in various levels of exercise. In function 3, there are several ways to communicate with all CrossFit members. They have a journal and several daily updated websites. The fourth feature is the use of various kinds of communication such as Facebook, Twitter, SMS, video, fundraising activities. For the fifth feature, they definitely have their own language. There are various names for their movement and exercises. The sixth feature they claim is that they have many experts and novices who make this organization a worldwide organization.

Svols, John. "Concept of Discourse Community" "Writing Writing", "University Readers", 2nd Edition. Elizabeth Wardle and Dagdowns. New York: Bedford / St. Martins, 2015. 217-227

"Writing Writing, College Reader, 2nd Edition." Elizabeth Wardord and Dagdowns. New York: Bedford / St. Martins, 2015

John Swales, University of Michigan, University of Michigan, Professor of Linguistics. In 1990 Swales wrote an article called "The Discourse Community's Concept". Sales defines the discourse community (a group of people with the same language rules) and describes the six characteristics that the community should follow to become a discourse community. The six features are as follows: James Porter's textual dialogue and discourse The community is an article published in rhetorical commentary on the content of the discourse community's original text in the autumn of 1986. Text interactivity is a network that conveys sentences and voices (Porter, 1986). Porter insists that writing is very similar to reading, and the background of the work written is an explanation of the reader (Porter, 1986).

Text author John Swales, "The Discourse Community Concepts" uses six definition functions to determine whether a group of people is considered a discourse community. Swales offers examples through his articles to truly understand the discourse community. He explained the differences between the language community and the discourse community and used many authors to support his view. "And the community of speech is basically defined as a community, knowledge of words and acts, and sharing rules of interpretation" (Swales, 219). He describes the speech community as someone with similar language rules

The discourse community is a group of people involved in a specific topic, problem, or field. According to the criteria of John Swales in the Concept of the Discourse Community, Christianity is to be regarded as a discourse community for its common goal, media, participation mechanism, specific types, and thresholds for members I can. Christianity meets the first standards of Swirls by achieving a series of common goals, such as spreading faith, spreading enlightenment and disseminating good morals. By spreading faith, members can gain knowledge to recruit new members. For example, in the church, there is an event that urges members of the community to discuss beliefs about recruiting new members.