In this chapter I will explain the concept of "cultural genocide" - the legal analysis and the history of how Rafael Lemkin changed the massive genocide "technology" in the 20th century. As reflected in the 1948 Genocide Treaty, from the physiological-biological point of view of genocide international law has been claimed to provide space to become an autonomous form of genocide. It is also called "genocide". This broader concept, in turn, encourages a defensive judicial interpretation of the legal definition of genocide and opposes the process of incorporating socio - cultural destruction. And it is redefined by "forced assimilation" or "ethnic cleansing".
Cultural carnage is an emotional and controversial model and must be qualified to the most precise range. This article is about discussing and defining the concept of cultural genocide. I think this process may involve a symbolic culture in the context of certain cultural landscapes. Thus, the cultural symbols associated with the identity of a particular group are confused / redefined as part of a widely planned strategy, which in turn renegotiates the identity of other groups conflicting with the initial population, Define a cultural massacre. The process is pretty. Therefore, this constitutes a cultural massacre. After accepting the above assumptions, pay attention to the potential important role that archeologists and anthropologists can play in emphasizing cultural genocide as a potential pioneer of physical genocide There must be.
Recognizing the difficulties involved in trying to define the term "genocide" and how the concepts such as "cultural genocide" and "political genocide" affect discussions on this issue. It is important to understand that cultural genocide or political carnage must be broadly defined to determine appropriate cases, but must be narrow enough to be underestimated. Cultural carnage is an emotional and controversial model and must be qualified to the most precise range. This article is about discussing and defining the concept of cultural genocide. I think this process may involve a symbolic culture in the context of certain cultural landscapes.
74 Many scholarships on cultural massacres are often defined as attempts to weaken the cultural identity of a group without physical violence. The concept of cultural genocide is often used to describe cultural elimination plots. Otherwise, these plots will not meet the exact definition of genocide, but scholars recently highlighted the close link between cultural destruction and material destruction. Please refer to Elazar Barkan's editing of "Massacre of Aboriginal People: Rhetoric of Human Rights", "Ghost / Massacre: Major Murder from Historical Perspective". Robert Gellately and Ben Kiernan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 126-38, Martin Shaw, what is genocide? (Cambridge: Political Press, 2007), 66-67; Wolff, "Settler Colonialism", 402. The solution of this theoretical argument is beyond the scope of this research.