The composition and role of the jury The jury has been a feature of British criminal justice for decades. This is a duty of citizens who are randomly selected from 12 voters between the ages of 18 and 70 (qualification of property is required before 1972 to qualify as a jury). Persons with mental disorder, those who received recent or severe convictions, and sentenced to five years in prison sentences and who were sentenced in a short period of time in the past 10 years or in a short period in the past 10 years. Man
Therefore, I would like to discuss the role and composition of the jury system in the jury system history and the UK legal system. First, the modern jury started with the ancient custom of many ancient Germanic tribes. There, groups of people with good character were used for criminal investigation and accused court trials. The same custom developed into the medieval German automobile court system as well. At Anglo-Saxon in the UK, the jury investigated the crime. After the conquest of Norman in 1066, a jury was appointed as a means of criminal investigation in several places in the country.
The jury plays an important role in the criminal justice system in England and Wales, and in many other countries around the world. However, as the Constitution is not written, the constitutional status of the British jury is very fragile. In the UK, the Constitution is not written, so the jurisdiction of the jury is not included in the Constitution. In general, it is governed by Congress' common law. And it can be fixed at any time. Therefore, the then government could change the jury trial or even cancel it. However, due to political obstacles, the government is very cautious about this point. The 1974 jury law is the main regulation governing incumbent juries. At the moment the role of the UK jury is almost completely limited to more serious criminal cases, but the jury occasionally participates in civil trials.
In the coming decades, states that passed the law on jury selection to prevent the role of the jury and the jury election process at the forefront of public opinion, the UK attempting to tie the jury with loyalists is there. After the American Revolutionary War, the jury was considered more important. Thomas Jefferson wrote as follows. "I was asked to decide whether it is best to exclude people in the legislative or judicial department and say that it is best not to take them out of legislation.