Essay sample library > The Civil War of Rome

The Civil War of Rome

2024-02-01 14:22:20

The visible civil warfare of most people in the Roman Civil War is not glory, but it is one of the most serious crimes that can be violated when the country is essential. Only in the most extreme circumstances should allow civil warfare to start (from the public eye) for just cause. With that in mind, Caesar has taken this into account, but in Rome too many mistakes have occurred in order not to start a war. The first of many problems is the collapse of the Big Three. Big Three was one of the main forces of the Roman government, at the time there were three leaders, Caesar, Pompeii, and Crass.

After the murder of Julius Caesar, a civil war occurred in Rome. From this confusion, the second trio consisting of Julius Caesar's nephews Lepidus, Antony and Octavian has appeared. The new Big Three ruled Rome for ten years, but like the case of the first trinity, there was the last inconsistency between the leaders. After defeating Lepidus, Octavian confronted the army with a more powerful Mark Antony. Anthony fell in love with Egyptian Queen Cleopatra. In the Battle of Actium on the Greek coast of the 31st century BC, the Octavian Navy defeated Anthony Navy and Cleopatra, both committed suicide.

Later Marc Anthony married Caesar's girlfriend Cleopatra and planned to use this very rich Egypt as the base to dominate Rome. The third civil war occurred between Octavia and Anthony and Cleopatra. This last civil war finally became the first Roman Emperor named Caesar Augustus who led him to the god who led to the latter failure at Actium which eventually led to the ultimate advantage of Octavian. Marcus Tullius Cicero was surprised at this because he was not part of this conspiracy, but later I wrote a letter to Trebonius's intrigue that he hoped "was invited to participate in that wonderful party." He believes that liberals should also kill Mark Anthony. However, conspirators decided that the death of a single tyrant became more symbolic, arguing that the intention was not a coup but a tyrant.