The Causes of Poverty - Cultural vs. Structural

It is a difficult task for sociologists involved in stratification and inequality to interpret the influence of cultural and structural factors that lead to discriminatory behavior between poverty and non-poverty. This is mainly because they look very intertwined. Structural and cultural factors promote each other in a complicated way. Universal cultural factors such as ideology and values ​​are used to construct and explain the existing socioeconomic structure and its impact on individuals.

Gregory Jordan (2004) is in an article entitled "Cause of Poverty - Culture and Structure: Can It Combine?" I will explain his statistical analysis. This is aimed at empirically judging to what extent the competition paradigm (culture and structure - institution) is correlated with poverty influence. Contrary to his hypothesis, he is concerned with the cultural and structural aspects (unemployment, income, race, income disparity, gross domestic product and gross domestic product) that are believed to contribute to poverty (divorce, crime, teen pregnancy and welfare) Imprisonment) could not be proved. Furthermore, cultural variables do not have a statistically significant impact on poverty, regardless of whether it is independent, or whether it is combined with various structural and institutional variables. In other words, divorce, crime, teen pregnancy and welfare do not lead to poverty.

There are many competing theories about the causes of poverty in the United States and there are many empirical evidence to support each. Although the culture and structure of poverty suggests that there are many different factors responsible for poverty, at the same time poverty is considered to be mainly due to personal social and behavioral flaws . Gregory Jordan argues that the cause of poverty is culture and behavior, or structure and economy, and the discussion between theorists and policy makers is divided into two. This paper provides an analysis to easily analyze the theoretical arguments behind the two and determine the empirical association of each theory. In addition, this discussion is welcomed in the field of political parties, Republicans support cultural and behavioral aspects, Democrats are leaning for structural and economic reasons.

There is much debate about evaluating poverty as a result of economic inequality than cultural attitudes and lifestyle sociology. In other words, poverty is caused by structural factors such as economic inequality. And lifestyle. The first group says that the poor are depleted by economic and political systems and that the poor can not reach good standards ... Global inequality Global inequality is urgent It continues to be a concern. Many subjects, especially department of economics. Industrial revolution and globalization are good catalysts because some countries are so rich and others are very poor as they enable competition and specialization. It can be said that it is historical, structurally, blessed with resources, lacking diversity, and so on.