The Cargo-Cult Science of Subliminal Persuasion

In the contemporary film industry, movie theaters nationwide earn billions of dollars by selling tickets alone. When using money on buttery popcorn, soft drinks, desserts containing a small amount of decayed teeth, the theater owner should be satisfied with the money enough. Still, there is no possibility that CEO of billionaire will reject more income. In introduction of "Subconsciously persuaded commodity worship science" by Anthony R.

Let's talk about the meaning of cargo cult science for those without experience. Cargo cult science is a phrase made by Richard Feynman and shows that scientific practice can not begin with a fundamentally rational first principle. This is the original paper on "The Science of Goods Cult" by Richard Feynman. If I have never read it, it is very fresh. I have read this article while studying physics. I do not know if I need to read physicists, but most physicists know this concept. Feynman wrote:

In 1974, Richard Feynman created the term "commodity worship science" as an analogy of the "food worship" of the Pacific Islands after the Second World War. Please bring back the items that the US military brought during the war. . Although the science of product worship seems like real science, it lacks the rigor of making science function. Likewise, "Cargo Worship Journal" has also undergone these initiatives, but for some reason there are people who implement the science of product worship, because of the lack of a process of true peer-reviewed journals. Therefore, there is no real recognition, others have their own ethical organization and parallel infrastructure for indexing services. Open access to London produces publication integrity and ethics (PIE), and many people are boasting the Copernicus index index or are pretending to be indexed by Scopus or Clarivate's Web of Science

Bongo playing, Nobel physicist physicist Richard Feynman accused these people to warn him about "so-called" product worship "and to sell" non scientific science ". He pointed out that people who are excellent storytellers tend to cheat people who do not have scientific rigor and statistical experience. But many of us with these skills recognize that these management and innovation experts are at the expense of the so-called 'choice of choice'. For example, suppose there is a theory that sharks are attacked with red shorts. In order to "prove" the theory, I studied the victim's shark attack with red shorts. Whenever something like this happens, I hit myself to tell everyone how delicious I am. However, with this method, the situation that someone is wearing red shorts and the shark has not been attacked is ignored. These data invalidate my theory, but I could not find them because I never looked for them