The Bureaucracy of Murder Revisited

As one of the oldest and most prestigious journals in economics, the Journal of Political Economy (JPE) provides important and important academic research in economic theory and practice. The journal is a very selective and widely cited analysis in many fields, including money theory, fiscal policy, labor economics, development, microeconomics and macroeconomic theory, international trade and finance, industrial organization and society, Present interpretation and empirical research. Economics

"Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued.

For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article.

Lim (2006) reviewed the old question on bureaucratic representative literature, asking if the interests of all the groups are really satisfied, or whether the profit of a group brings to the cost of others. For example, if a female bureaucrat pursues women's needs and interest in the general population, is men's interest ignored or ignored? Will democracy be distorted? Of course, this is contrary to the existence of representative bureaucracy, which requires bureaucratic demographic diversity. From a practical point of view, this indicates that all sectors of society are represented by government agencies. An important empirical study shows this. Meier, Wrinkle, and Polinard stated, "Proceeding to a more representative bureaucracy does not produce harmful results for the majority of people ... seems to be no redistribution of results" (1999, 1036)

The reputation of bureaucracy is not good as it has become an organization and government with unnecessary procedures in the red. When dealing with bureaucracy it is expected to fill in many forms and wait. In the lively movie "Brazil", bureaucracy was ridiculed and people were doing troublesome work at the desk. Bureaucracy is an organization managed by a desk or office. Bureau, get it?

Bureaucratic malice is obvious (and discussed in the next section), but this form of organization is not entirely bad. In other words, there is a well-known "traditional" interest related to bureaucracy. For example, bureaucratic regulations and regulations guarantee that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will take appropriate precautions to protect US health while approving new drugs. The red tape document also benefits from bureaucracy not being personalized. For example, the applicant must submit a number of documents to obtain a government student loan. But this long and frustrating process encourages all applicants to treat equality. In short, everyone has a chance to raise funds fairly. Bureaucracy also encourages partiality. That is, friendship and political influence should not affect access to funds in an organization that works well.