The Birth of a Nation (1915)

I do not think there is much less immoral language than the word "politically correct"; these words immediately evoke free pseudo-fascism and that this free pseudo-fascism dominates the university and media everywhere Some also think. Freedom of speech and thought The things classified as politically wrong are proud to reflect this label as if it is rebellious, David said these psedo- I am working on Fascist songs. Leah's people fought. It's not. The movie of DW Griffith is far from a politically incorrect movie, not a critic of the liberal elite, it is a long-standing movie and has produced a myth of the south to some extent. It is black. The thing that is scary about this movie is that it is not a voice but a personal story that many people give for reconstruction. This movie has not been presented this way and has not been received this way. It was not until the 1960s that this movie became normal and daily reconstruction was understood both in the north and the south (note, however, that the distance between the north and the south should be deliberately as far as possible) . It is not a soldier of Lincoln or a labor union that is black and does not have "radical" (who). The movie is trying to attract northern viewers)

Anyone complaining about the political correctness of the current academic community and historical "revisionism" can be seen. And please understand that the historical 'revisionist' work is responsible for teaching facts about the history of our country, involved in novels such as the birth of Griffith's bad country. Do not think too much about complaining about future political correctness

And do not try to separate the work as a work of art from the historical point of view of the movie. Do not forget that this movie is not only part of history but also part of history. When all three are very real political issues, it will help protect apartheid and clans. Immediately after the movie, it was not a coincidence that the big picture and Jim Crow's law appeared. In other words, this movie is pressing people. Therefore, do not think that it is in the midst of entertainment, not affected by it, and does not affect everything around it.

D. W. Griffith's "Birth of the State" (1915) is probably the most influential film in American movie history. Griffith's movie is a magnificent exhibit of "language" of movie development, so it is certainly and perfect, in some ways, this movie has not changed much in the 90 years since publishing "national birth" . From its absolute length and scale - the movie will last on 3 hours and hundreds of shows - the birth of the country will change the audience forever to get used to seeing the roll far beyond all the early movies Amount of media movie from 15 minutes to 30 minutes. In making this film, Griffith invented the concept of feature film basically

Of course, the birth of the country (1915) challenged contemporary audiences. They are not used to silent movies, they are not interested in the history of the movie, they think it is strange or they do not suit their taste. People who evolved enough enough to understand what they saw were thought that the early and wartime scenes were wonderful, but they were interested in postwar scenes and reconstruction scenes. Hum style racial discrimination manga booklet. Mary Pickford said: "The birth of the country is really the first picture that people make the movie industry think seriously." The movie is the highest in box office revenue until it is replaced with another movie about civil war and rebuilding Holds the movie paid. In 1992, the Library of Congress considered this film "culturally, historically, or aesthetically important" and chose to save it in the National Film Register.