The Balance of Novelty and Similarities

The article by Hargadon and Douglas "When Innovation Meets the Institution: Edison and Light Design" analyzes how Edison successfully introduced and commercialized electric lighting systems in a resilient social environment. One way he uses is to apply a robust design that the author thinks Edison's innovation is a tool that helps to gain social recognition and break the gas lighting association's lock. The concept of robust design requires that innovative ones and entrepreneurs make complex decisions, including presentations of new (old) (old) (similarity) and hidden contents (Hargadon and Douglas 2001, 476--501).

Since the launch of Joel Lehman and Kenneth Stanley in 2008, Novelty Search had many extensions. Two of them are called Minimum Criteria Novelty Search (MCNS) and Novelty Search (NSLC) with Local Competition, two of which focus on maximizing novelties in different ways. Another way of implementing these algorithms can be thought of. I call this a new network approach. It is difficult to define the new content and the differences you are looking for in the field of solutions. This is not inconvenient - it is recommended. In fact, different differences may lead to creativity. There is evidence that we are around - evolution of nature, human innovation and so on. Vacuum tubes cause computers - But if we tell people that we are looking for computers at that time, we do not have vacuum tubes or computers

Mathematical thinking is mixed with novelty and scale. Thanks to the novelty, you can split apparently complex tasks (such as storing 31 box combinations) into simpler tasks. With this scale, we can extend our ideas to other more general cases. Only by rediscovering the method and reason behind the technique, we can achieve both. I remembered my reasoning thinking (I think there are many things in her) for my students. Focused her attention on the digital model of each box, resisting the reflexive tendency of her memory case. It helps to write a list of all box combinations - the goal is not to remember them but to discover subtle insights that may be buried

I can generalize by distinguishing our cognitive dilemma between two types of novelty the world may contain. Type 1 novelty is an alternative type of CALM mode. This applies to language novelties, and novelties that arise when material particles are arranged in various ways. It is basically combined and iterative and transparent. Type 2 novelty is a type that can not be seen like this, so it raises a nickname "real": the emergence of consciousness from the brain is an example. We enter the field of philosophy only when we are exposed to the new idea of ​​the second class with the emergence of radicals, uncertainty and the concept of unconstrained duality. A distinctive response to subsequent confusion is to try to interpret the case of type 2 as a true type 1 case (like doing a typical family project) (always destined).