The Art of Rhetoric

Desire for rhetoric is always to acquire and maintain happiness. Corax (and / or Tisias) of Syracuse is considered the first theorist to design rhetoric art as a means to help citizens regain their possession under the rule of tyrant. In this most important case of Greek and Roman speech, political happiness is sought through a judicial speech. In theory, the pluralistic discourse of rhetorical well-being spread out from the depth and scope of philosophy, metaphysics, ethics, religion, psychology, aesthetics.

The thesis on Aristotle's rhetoric is systematically describing citizen's rhetoric as a human art or skill (technique). It is more like an objective theory than interpretive theory with a rhetorical tradition. Aristotle's rhetorical art emphasizes that persuasion is the purpose of rhetoric. He defines rhetoric as "the ability to observe persuasive means available in every particular case", essentially a discovery model that limits art to the process of invention, Aristotle sets the logical aspects of the process I emphasize. In his story, rhetoric is the art of discovering all the convincing means available. Speakers support the possibility of messages through logical, moral, and emotional proofs. As much as possible, there are logotypes, spirits and sorrows of all forms, but in fact it discusses not only the style and (simply) the elements conveyed but also the appeal of emotional appeals (sorrow) and functions It is. (spirit).

In the field of rhetoric, there is an ideological argument about the definition of Aristotle's rhetoric. Some people think that Aristotle defines rhetoric rhetoric as persuasive art, and others think that he defines it as art of judgment. Rhetoric as an art of judgment means that rhetoric can identify persuasive means available through selection. Aristotle also said that rhetoric is relevant to judgment as the audience judges the spirit of rhetoric. One of the most famous Aristotle's doctrines is the concept of a theme (also known as common theme or common theme). This term has a wide range of uses (for example, a combination of memory technology and exercises), usually refers to "seat of discussion" (a list of thinking categories or inference patterns). Speakers can use generation parameters or proofs.

Rhetoric is art that "leads the soul through words" (261 a 8). Popular rhetoric is a belief in persuasion, not art. Suicide rhetoricology requires philosophy, but does philosophy require rhetoric? Why "philosophical discourse" - like the example of "Socrates dialogue" - how is it related to rhetoric? Phaedrus pointed out an interesting idea that all words are rhetorical, even though the speaker is trying to convey the truth - indeed, the true rhetorical method is the art of telling the truth (277e 5 - 278 b 4 Please note the widespread discussion of dialogue)) Rhetoric (261 d 10 - e 4 and background) occurs where people speak anytime, anywhere. Even when people are thinking about something through themselves - even when they are engaged in internal dialogue - even when a person does not know what the truth is, there is discourse and persuasion I guess. Self-fraud is a permanent possibility (Socrates suggests, a note from Cratylus 428 d)