The art of reading essay #2

At the beginning of this article, Yutang began talking about the difference between a person's reading psychology and a person not reading. Lin tells us his opinion is very cautious and how small a person does not read that his life is in a series of customs. Rin stated that he was only watching what happened near him, he was impressed (90). Representing a fundamental perspective like the heart of a reader frequently may be dangerous to the author as compared to the hearts of those who have not read it. "It may be very dangerous" ... show more

(92); he talked about how the school makes children so bored. Reading does not stimulate children's negative emotions. That's why I think he is perfectly correct. In my opinion, 60% of those who have not read are forced to read what they do not care about at school. There is an opportunity to read something you are interested in and sit in one place, but at the same time, make opportunities to travel without paying face, landscape, scene, and money everywhere. On the other hand, I think that reading what we are not interested in is something we can not get rid of. School is the stage of life we ​​have to pass through Fortunately, if you are positive, I am facing it with just a positive attitude. It is a mistake to refuse not to read. If you are one of them, this article is perfect for reading. We are very different from each other, and Lin tries to make us understand "people absolutely must not be booed" (92). He said there are no books to read, but readers sometimes may need to read a particular book. Despite the conditions and emotions we are experiencing, we all receive a variety of lecture "flavors". That's why Jeremy Lin wrote that if you read this book, how can you make a different impression?

If you get absorbed in your reading of life, if you improve your skills of reading and become a leader of reading - I can guarantee you that you are not just acquiring this art. "A statement from two to one book a year is as normal as eating, drinking or reading this article."

I posted an article about Monday that art is not free. If you are reading it, it may be because you first read it. It is a little traction. Some of the critics on the work tried to argue that art is not a necessary human activity, or that it is simply a luxury that gives wealth and strength. The more I think about this, I discover that the value itself of this argument itself is not only wrong, but that human society exists because art is what we share. Technology that ties all of us together. An unknown builder of Gobekli Tepe knows this. People who invented sentences in various birthplaces of human civilization also know this. I knew that art was engraved on both sides regardless of where the two stones stacked and formed a monument or a temple. Whenever we find a sentence we can see that someone has decided to use sentences to write poetry and talk epic.

More than 6,000 subscribers gather in ART + marketing publications. Everyone on this planet is a mother artist, everything you write is art, everything you read is art. I am already using the real desire that Americans want to chase after Starbucks true individualist thinkers.