The Argumentative Essay:

The purpose of the controversial article is to present your conclusions in your reasons to accept your views and persuade the audience to consider at least seriously.

Every assumption (step) has evidence and you have to explain how you have come to a conclusion

Do they use different premises to reach different logical conclusions? Do they use intuition or emotion to develop their beliefs or assumptions?

Take care of their arguments against you and be sure to resolve possible criticisms when you support your claim.

Acts discussed in academic writing is an act of entering dialogue (Graff and Birkenstein ix)

The same is true for academic papers. Before advocating your claim, you must create content on your subject for your readers.

The books they said / I said: "important" in Gerald Graf and Cathy Birkenstein's academic papers, including many phrases and examples to explore "template" and expression patterns and strategies of your academic discussion Behavior.

Regardless of what it is, the reader must first summarize it so that you can learn why you discuss it.

This summary may be just a few words of your referral, or it may be part of the phased logic of your reasoning.

In 1963, eight religious leaders announced a statement against the protest action led by the king. Mr. Kim opposed all the views when he demonstrated the reasons of his actions and the legitimacy of his career and answered their remarks and various ideas their sympathists might think.

Kim said in the article, "You regret the demonstration in Birmingham, but I am sorry that you did not express similar concerns about the conditions your statements led to the demo - ( Graff and Birkenstein 5) King of qtd.

Kim uses the word "you" because he speaks directly to the audience, but may also use "them" - they say this, but I say this

"State" and "Relationship" required for news coverage - Nature of author's purpose for writing (35)