The Argument Against Torture

Mr. Razan Tanbour of the Islamic Institute of Michigan has controversial since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. This type of information gathering technology was always the main topic of discussion at each war. In cases like 9/11 terrorist attacks, torture should not be used as a means to save countless lives. Advocates of torture utilize the situation that the lives of thousands and even millions of people are always related to possible terrorists and the happiness of his torture.

According to the above discussion, the act of allowing torture in any case is dangerous as it may affect a wide range of people. In addition to the moral debate on torture, legal procedures are needed to ensure that the perpetrators of torture are justice. The inhumane character of the act and its suspicious usefulness and the broader impact always make torture morally misleading. However, the situation of human nature, (which must always be an individual who must make a decision) must be regarded as a mitigation factor

Utilitarian debate over torture argues that most torture is not used as a means of extracting information, but as a means of intimidating and conquering the people, and the power of the state is a usual way of establishing innocence or guilt and the whole legislation It makes it possible to abandon the means. Total equipment. Therefore it is best to kill a few people by bombers, not more people - perhaps thousands of innocent people - to be tortured and murdered. During the investigation of the kidnapping case of Prime Minister Aldemoro in Italy, it was reported that Carlos Alberto Deira Chiesa replied that he recommended it to one of the security guards. The suspects were tortured and said, "Italy can survive the failure of Aldemolo and can not survive the introduction of torture."