The Alchemy of Race and Rights

Professor Williams uses a story in a traditional framework, which is used for legal commentary and is used to complement traditional legal analysis. For example. Legal analysis is not supplemented. When it comes to the notorious story that has been called Benetton Story, the university has to decide whether the story is really a valid scholarship. And how should it be evaluated, assuming it is a legal scholarship? These are some difficult questions raised in the use of stories in legal scholarships.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) originally appeared as an anti-legal scholarship for free legal discourse of positivism and civil rights. This academic tradition is against the slow pace of ethnic reform in the United States. Critical racism begins with the idea that racial discrimination is normal in American society. We also use storytelling to get out of the mainstream legal scholarship. It criticizes liberalism and believes that white people are always the primary beneficiaries of civil rights law. Because school education in the United States aims to nurture citizens, CRT will examine how citizenship and ethnicity interact. The role of critical racial theory in understanding educational inequality is still in its early stages. It is necessary to criticize some of the most valuable legal victories and educational reform movement in the civil rights era like multiculturalism.

Criticize racism theory. Critical racial theory is studying racial justice and "racial consciousness" in the social environment (Babbie, 2007). During the civil rights movement, this concern for race became serious in the mid-1970s. Civil rights activists use this view to change domestic and state laws that give ethnic power to ethnic minorities. Exchange theory exchanging theory was founded by social scientist George Homans to test human behavior through decision cost and benefit. It approaches social relationships from a basic psychological starting point, based on how individuals perceive things, how they infer and how to draw conclusions "(Babbie, 1995)