Lack of knowledge "I will never forget the first night of the camp that made my life a long night that night ... I will never forget smoke ..." Night does not necessarily mean the light Not lacking the symbol of knowledge Elie Wiesel's book "Night" is a true explanation of the Holocaust for many Jews as well as for humans. The night was dark, collapsing in the silence and the gray sky, all that happened at that time in Germany was kept secret.
This wonderful article clearly shows the opposite of American history and Korean history in World War II World Theater. The basic and recurring problem is that you do not have much more knowledge than publicity. This is a failure of general education. And, yes, I know that this is a metaphor repeatedly and repeatedly overlooked. All American universities continue to attract talented young people from all over the world, even if they continue to fall into the world. However, this is part of the problem, not an increase in ignorance to the American population. The ignorance of the history of the modern world and its dependence on more and more imaginary stories can not even provide a reasonable solution to the actual concern of the DPRK.
In the last few decades of the 20th century, when the first exhibition of contemporary art in the Middle East was presented to viewers in North America and Europe, the lack of knowledge of the Middle Eastern art educated in North America and European schools It became clear. The team tried to organize the gap of our knowledge. Its purpose is to dig into the blind spots and obstacles of rural, regional, national, and cross-border archives by writing and mobilizing art historical knowledge projects to learn, participate and write contemporary art in the Middle East. Linguists were created by linguist Iain Boal and scientific historian Robert Proctor to study cultural ignorance; the group explored Western contemporary Middle Eastern art. The missing knowledge, its cultural factors, and its impact on the practice and history of art
Based on the considerations Pritchard proposed in various places (2010; 2012; 2013; 2014), it is related to the existence of knowledgeless cognitive achievement (eg in the case of barn exterior, environment Luck and knowledge are mutually exclusive) But it is compatible with cognitive achievement and lacks cognitive achievement in the presence of knowledge (eg in case of testimony in a friendly environment, knowledge acquisition requires few agents He does not), he combines with knowledge that cognitive achievement is basically not considered (as an epistorist insists on a virtue of recognition. In fact, he insists that he is divided in two directions. Creating knowledge without strong cognitive achievement and not understanding corresponding knowledge - none) strong cognitive achievement of knowledge But recent criticism by Carter & Gordon (2014) that an important identity is a strong cognitive achievement three Please.