The Abandonment of the Jews by David Wyman

David Wyman told the Jews' to try to weaken the ability to fight war to kill the Jews, but America and its allies have little to save them "(p. 5 ) As Hitler hates Jews, if we could spend half the energy to love the Jews, we might have made a big change. Wyman's book "Giving Jews" is very interesting to me. I thought it was very thorough but I wondered why this terrible thing was allowed to happen.

In 1984, the second book on the subject of David S. Weiman, "Abandonment of the Jews: America and the Holocaust" (1941 - 45) stimulated this theme. Fierce criticism of Wiman's US inaction has arisen from extensive research. Even Wyman's critics do not help, but I am impressed with his research scope. Similarly, strong criticism has been given to the second PBS documentary "America and the Holocaust: fraud and indifference" which is part of PBS's popular series "American Experience". According to historian David McCullough, it depends greatly on Wyman's work and is severely prosecuting Roosevelt and American Jews. The premise of the movie was obvious from the first frame when the talker killed the 6 million Jews "waiting in the US" during the Second World War. The movie responds to what critics frequently hear. . The US deliberately gave up the Jews. In other words, this is an intentional policy, not rude or bureaucratic confusion.

After reading David Wyman's "Abandoning Jews", I read about Rosen 's work directly. Wyman devoted all his books to the thorough review of Jewish relief, Zionism, State Council meeting, bombing, St. Louis tour from 1941 to 1945, but Rosen was forced to write I felt it was too subjective, but on page 2 "Roosevelt could not understand Adolf Hitler, I thought he was wrong" For example on 495 pages he said "Roosevelt is American Jewish It is perfect whether it is the leader of the aircraft, "he said," I fully swore Roosevelt "to destroy axis fighters. Ironically, it was Rosen who wrote a letter to counter Wyman's "revisionist" agenda, Wiman's history depended on his history. Did he win even the debate about St. Louis than their feelings against Roosevelt?