The Principles of Contradiction and Sufficient Reason

Leibniz wrote in his "monism" that the principle of his contradiction and sufficient rationality is the basis of the theory found in this paper. Although it can be said that the principle itself is fundamental, by combining the best principle, the principle of predicate concept, the principle of perfect concept, and the principle of indistinguishability, this group has a very convincing argument the axiom I made it. The principle of contradiction indicates that propositions can not exist at the same time.

The principle of Leibniz 's discrepancy and complete rationality is discussed above, but these two principles distinguish between the truth of reasoning and the truth of Leibniz' s facts, ie the necessary truth and occasional truth It is used for. The description of Leibniz's form is handled elsewhere, but here we need a brief explanation of this difference. When inferring the truth, its reason or explanation can be found by analyzing the concept of "analyze to simpler ideas and simple truths until reaching the original language." (G VI 612 / AG 217) In the end, the principle of inconsistency is valid as all the truths of inference can be resolved to primitive or identity. On the other hand, in fact, it is impossible to pinpoint the cause with a limited analytical process or solution concept. (See below)

Understanding the necessary truth provides reason, thought and science. Human reasoning is based on two principles: contradiction and good reason. In addition, there are two types of facts: inference and facts. The truth of reasoning can be found through analysis. This is the process of simplifying problems and ideas until you reach the first and most original idea. It is even possible to break up the body into infinite simple bodies. This simplification process has infinite details. This details can go back to the previous, more detailed condition. In order to justify it, each conditional element MUST be analyzed. The complete or ultimate reason must be outside the scope of this simplification process. How infinite it is, or how long it can go back. Therefore, all of these simplifications must have a simple entity that can result, whose entity is a list. This monad is a god