THE ‘HISTORY OF ART’ AND THE ‘HISTORY OF TASTE’

Eva Chapel, "Art History" and "History of Taste", Journal of British Aesthetics, Vol. 3, No. 2, April 1, 1963, pp. 157-159, https: //doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/3.2.157

Rosemary Joyce. "World Art History" reflects the fields related to the history of the colonial era in the history of art and part of the landscape of the newer world where there is a possibility that art history from other than Europe and North America may be born We are about to define a way to become. David Summers' debate on Teotihuacan and Mexico's comet shows that world art history can understand radically different traditions like their own terms. James Elkins vibrates between recognizing that art history is no longer a permanent difference between local practice and depiction of art history and may reflect the same epistemological position that may reflect other epistemological positions higher evaluate.

Art history is the history of various people, their culture is built through their work of art. Art historians compare various eras of art history. For example, comparison between medieval art and Renaissance art. This cultural history is expressed in various forms among their works of art. Art can be exhibited through clothing, architecture, religion, and sports. Or more visual artworks such as paintings, drawings and sculptures. As a term, art history (the product is a history of art) contains several ways to study visual arts, which are often used to refer to art and architecture. The aspects of the field overlap. As an art historian Ernst Gombrich observed, "The field of art history is very similar to Caesar's Gaul, which was divided into three parts, but three different living but not necessarily hostile tribes : (I) enthusiast, (ii) critic, (iii) academic art historian