Texas V. Johnson Reflections Essay

After reading "Texas versus Johnson" and "American flags represent tolerance", I was able to better understand the Supreme Court's decision and Allen's opinion. Both texts indicate that the act of burning the flag of Gregory Lee Johnson is permitted, but it is unacceptable. In "Texas v. Johnson", intonation is very accurate and very important. "The way to preserve the specialness of the flag is not to punish people with different opinions about these things, to persuade them to make a mistake" (Brennan 16). Judge Brennan put together a court ruling and his own opinion in a clear and intentional way. The court has decided to allow the incineration of the American flag, but Brennan suggested that people should be aware that they were doing it wrong. However, in "The American flag expresses tolerance", Allen's condition is very emotional and self-righteous, and the structure of the sentence is free. "The American flag is a valuable symbol of the aspirations of our country, which is the closest object to the idol of the people, just comparable to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence ... I insist on respecting that harm slightly" (Allen 18). Allen considers this flag to be a very important symbol of the country and believes that everyone should respect it. The tone used to explain his reasoning is extremely intense, as Allen points out a mistake in the decision. Allen thinks the Supreme Court's ruling is not wrong, but his opinion is very strong. In addition, the tone of both text matches the background of written articles.

"Texas versus Johnson" is an argument, and "American flags represent tolerance" is an editorial, it affects the condition. Since the sentence of "Texas v. Johnson incident" comes from the Supreme Court, it is expected that this document is formal and should contain more evidence than the opinion. Judge Brennan used to support the first amendment

There are obvious similarities, but the difference between "Texas vs. Johnson majority vote" that "William J, Brennan, Ronald J Allen" American flag expresses tolerance "is very striking. Since "Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion" is the Supreme Court's document, it focuses on concrete topics. For example, "The American flag means tolerance." "Therefore, if this exchange is prohibited, Article 1 of the amendment states that we can protect our speech only when no one is offended." This article refers to the first amendment and " Texas v. Johnson's majority vote "does not respond to them using other documents or comparisons, but remains about the problem of burning the national flag. "This is to convince them that they are wrong" (37-39). In "The American flag expresses tolerance", the text states "irritation is controversial".

Texas v. Johnson, 491 US 397 (1989) The Texas State Law states that the American flag is a criminal proceeding, but it is unconstitutional as it infringes the protection of the first amended symbolic speech. Alaska and Wyoming are two exceptions - the law banning the flag's flag in 48 of the 50 states has invalidated the decision. Citizen United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 US 310 (2010) Restrictions on corporate and union political expenditure during the election cycle violated provision of freedom of expression of the first amendment. As long as the expenditure is independent of the candidate, the company and the union can use an unlimited amount to support or oppose the candidate.