Search the latest articles related to your topic; many of them will save you valuable time and summarize the past literature of the area. Even if you explain, remember that attribute.
Literature review may be overwhelming. You can not find everything. Find the literature that best explains your topic or most relevant.
The purpose of literature review is to show you that you understand the "whole picture" and put your research and recommendations in the context of other research in that field.
The literature review is an interpretation of what the recognized researchers presented about the topic. Sometimes you will be asked to write it as a separate task (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliography, but it is part of a research report, paper, paper or paper introduction).
1. What are the specific topics, questions or research questions that will help my literature review define?
2. What type of literature review do you do? Do I see a theoretical problem? How? What is your policy? Quantitative research (eg effectiveness of new procedures) Qualitative research (eg study)
3. What is the scope of my literature review? What kind of publications do you use (eg journal, books, government documents, mass media). What kind of subjects (eg psychology, organizational behavior, education) are you working on?
4. How good is my information? Is my search scope sufficient to confirm that I have found all related materials? Is it narrow enough to exclude extraneous material? Is the number of materials I use suitable for the length of my paper?
Have you critically analyzed the literature you used? Do I follow a series of concepts and questions and compare projects in a way that deals with them? Do I simply evaluate them not to list projects and summarize them, but to discuss strengths and weaknesses?
The direct background of this review article is literature review of improvisational use and theory in various fields including education and teacher education in the field of authors. Open literature research on the concept of instant creation and related search terms has led to the discovery of many academic and specialized disciplines. However, as a result of reviewing the results of the review for the first time, it seemed that five different areas or traditional discoveries were particularly relevant for review issues. Rhetoric tradition, music tradition, drama / drama tradition, tradition of organization theory and tradition of education.
In order to organize and interpret the description data, we reviewed the following three related fields in the literature. They are (a) language education and learning theory, (b) language teaching and language skill methods, and (c) incumbent teacher training. This chapter summarizes the results of reviews in these three main areas. Researchers acknowledge the complexity of teaching and learning effective teachings (Ballentyne, Bain and Packer, 1999; Calderhead, 1996; Clark and Peterson, 1986). In elementary and junior high school, the difficulty of learning and education and complicated process are well studied (Ethell, 1997; Wideen, Mayer-Smith and Moon, 1998). Derived from these studies is the understanding of the central role of the teacher's view and theory in educational practice (Pajares, 1992; Richardson, 1996; and Trumbull, 1990).
Teaching and learning a second language is a difficult task. If extra effort is required to master the second language, teaching the second language is difficult for the teacher. In this article we discuss the theory of learning a second language and the teacher's responsibility to teach a second language.