Terry v. Ohio: The Stop and Frisk

Two policemen got into the bus from Miami, Fort Lauderdale to Atlanta. They look like police, one of them shows guns, they ask Bostick for their tickets and identity cards without any doubt. Both tickets and ID cards have been checked out. But then they asked for medicine on his baggage.

It is a pause - Can a reasonable person arbitrarily refuse the official request, or can encounter the encounter in any other way?

There is no indication that Bostic will not arbitrarily refuse official's request, so there is no confiscation; freedom of departure of Bostic is restricted by bus, not by police

The time from Honolulu to Miami is 20 hours, but Miami only stayed for 48 hours.

1968 - Terry v. Ohio - In some cases, a cease fight and a strike do not violate the Constitution. The court endorses Terry 's conviction and rule 8 - 1, and if there is a reasonable doubt that a crime has occurred or is about to happen, the police will deter and plunder individuals without arrest.

Terry stop is an alias for stop and frisk, the US Supreme Court Terry v. It comes from the case of Ohio. If the police reasonably doubts that someone is armed, conducting criminal acts or conducting criminal acts, the policeman pauses to go to the court for easy searching You can bind it. Terry's cancellation is a seizure in the sense of the fourth revision. In traffic congestion setting, it is legal for Terry's survey to be canceled as long as the Terry survey is canceled as long as the police are binding the car and its resident before checking for a vehicle violation. Police do not need to believe that passengers in the vehicle are involved in criminal activity.

It is closely related to the encounter of the second layer, "stop and search" or "Terry station". The latter term came from the decision of Ohio v. Terry v. Supreme Court that one police officer watched the two who thought he would take the store. The police approached one of them, clapped his coat lightly and put on his coat to take out the pistol. In this case, the US Supreme Court judged that eavesdropping and collecting firearms does not infringe Terry's fourth revision right. So what does this mean to you? If you are walking along the street, can officials approach you and knock you lightly? Absolutely not. Only when he or she reasonably believes that you are armed or dangerous, officials are allowed to knock on the coat according to specific and obvious facts. Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)