Terrorism and the Fight for Freedom

Battle for Freedom In most cases, remembering the 1960s, people will not forget to ask about gender, drugs, racial discrimination. However, what they overlook often is the focus of "freedom" in this era. This is not just about the freedom that all Americans have at that time. It focuses on the struggle of young people to eliminate values ​​and ideas left for freedom or by old generations. While young people seriously explained the struggle for winning these freedom while writing articles about the 1960s, adopted another more dramatic way to demonstrate the struggle involved in these struggles There is a tendency to do. .

- Our peaceful and popular youth revolution is based on the principles of freedom, democracy, human rights, freedom of speech and press, peace, coexistence of humans, fight against corruption and organized crime, war against terrorism, resistance to violence, It shows that extremism and dictatorship are the values ​​of common interests of human beings, ideals, demands, and goals are cherished by the international community as a whole. These will never be subdivided selectively or cancelively due to differences in human characteristics or sovereignty requirements.

Terrorism itself is a curse to human rights. Modern human rights standards are rooted in four simple values: 1 freedom from desire, freedom from fear, freedom of belief, and freedom of speech. These freedoms constitute the core principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which has been accepted by United Nations member states and which prescribes the basic elements of international human rights detailed in many subsequent human rights treaties. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is viewed as "a common success criterion for all people and for all countries." 2

Let's spend some time discussing specific themes of terrorism related to religious freedom. As stated earlier, the fight against terrorism brings challenges to human rights protection. The government recognizes that all governments are responsible for protecting them from violence and terrorism, but the government must respect human rights. According to international human rights law, the protection of public safety and order is a legitimate government interest. However, restrictions on freedom of expression or religious freedom of religion must be directly related to and corresponding to the specific needs underlying that restriction. Furthermore, you should not impose restrictions in a discriminatory way.